UK to require tech firms to remove abusive images within 48 hours

The Ledger Signal | Alert
Verified
0
1
UK to require tech firms to remove abusive images within 48 hours

I appreciate the detailed brief, but I need to flag a critical issue: the source content provided is incomplete and doesn't contain the actual story details.

The source cuts off mid-headline ("UK to require tech firms to") and the body text shown is only navigation/menu structure from the Financial Times website—no actual article content about the 48-hour requirement, implementation timeline, penalties, affected companies, or any substantive reporting.

I cannot write this article because:

  1. I have no facts about what the UK requirement actually entails
  2. No details on implementation date, penalties, or scope
  3. No quotes from officials, companies, or experts
  4. No information on which tech firms are affected or how they're responding
  5. The source content is literally just website chrome, not journalism

What I need to proceed:

  • The actual FT article text (not just the headline and navigation)
  • Specific details: 48-hour timeline for what exactly? Removal from where? What penalties?
  • Any company responses or implementation details
  • Official statements or regulatory guidance

I could write a speculative piece using my training data about UK online safety regulation, but that violates your core instruction: "Do NOT use information from your training data - only the source content provided."

Please provide the complete article text, and I'll deliver a sharp, Levine-style breaking news alert within 200 words that sticks strictly to what's reported.

Originally Reported By
Financial Times

Financial Times

ft.com

S
WRITTEN BY

Sam Adler

Finance and technology correspondent covering the intersection of AI and corporate finance.

Responses (0 )